Blog
New Belgian Article 10 Guidelines: A Fresh Start for Honest Collaboration Between Industry and Healthcare Professionals

The Belgian FAMHP just made things clearer. On 12 May 2026, the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP) released its long-awaited Guidelines on Article 10 of the 1964 Law. This isn’t new legislation – it’s something even more valuable: a clear, practical explanation of how the Agency interprets the rules and how inspectors will evaluate real-world situations. For pharmaceutical companies, MedTech manufacturers, hospitals, and healthcare professionals, this is a major milestone. Good news for MedTech: the rules now clearly apply to you too. Article 10 fully covers medical devices and their accessories. What was often seen as mainly a pharmaceutical issue now officially applies across the entire sector.

How do the guidelines affect our current practices?

The core principle hasn’t changed – but the expectations have. At its heart, the rule is simple and strong: No premiums, financial benefits, or gifts linked to prescribing, supplying, dispensing, or administering medicines or medical devices — unless they fall squarely into one of the legal exceptions. The Guidelines repeatedly remind us: you must be able to prove that every interaction genuinely fits an exception. No grey areas.

Only three allowed exceptions.

The FAMHP clearly defines just three categories:

1     Gifts of negligible value that are relevant to professional practice

2     Scientific meetings (now much stricter — and much clearer)

3     Legitimate scientific services provided by healthcare professionals

Everything else? Still prohibited. The biggest section of the Guidelines is dedicated to scientific events. To be compliant, a meeting must meet all five cumulative criteria:

  •            Exclusively scientific content
  •            Hospitality strictly limited to the scientific purpose
  •            Appropriate venue and reasonable duration
  •            Funding limited to official participation costs
  •            Sponsorship only for eligible healthcare professionals

The distinction is now crystal clear: Scientific meetings ≠ Promotional events. Product launches, commercial roadshows, business dinners, open days, and promotional workshops are explicitly not allowed under this exception. Transparency is no longer optional — it’s essential.

What are the expectations of participants in the pharmaceutical industry?

One of the strongest messages in the Guidelines is the demand for real transparency. Companies and organisers must keep:

  •            Written agreements
  •            Detailed budgets
  •            Traceable payments
  •            Original invoices
  •            Solid supporting documentation

Retention period? Ten years. This is what inspectors will expect to see.

What should companies do now? This is the moment to act. Review and strengthen:

  •            Sponsorship and congress approval processes
  •            Advisory board and consultancy agreements
  •            Event budgets and financial flows
  •            Documentation systems
  •            Internal SOPs and compliance training

The Guidelines will very likely become the benchmark document during future FAMHP inspections.

Final thoughts — why this matters 

This isn’t just another regulatory update. It’s a real step toward cleaner, more transparent, and more scientifically independent relationships between industry and healthcare professionals. It raises the bar on integrity while providing much-needed clarity. For compliance teams, Medical Affairs, and Responsible Persons for Information and Publicity (RIPs), now is the perfect time to revisit your processes — before the next inspection. The goal remains what it always was: protecting patients through ethical, science-based collaboration. These Guidelines simply make it easier for everyone to get it right.

🤝 Need Expertise?

For any questions regarding RIP matters and responsibilities, the Q-support Expert Team is ready to assist.